Öznur Demirci1, Oytun Erbaş1

1ERBAS Institute of Experimental Medicine, Illinois, USA & Gebze, Türkiye

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, traumatic brain injury

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a condition that occurs as a result of uncontrolled pressure applied to the brain in situations such as falls, accidents, and sports, disrupting an individual's daily life. The severity of problems experienced varies depending on the levels of damage (mild, moderate, severe). Following the primary and secondary injury processes, the brain's recovery reactions can lead to cognitive impairments in the long term. The idea that the brain may not want to remember such traumas, resulting in the inability to recall certain memories for a short or long period, could lead to the conclusion that dementia is normal. However, this is not a sufficient basis. Therefore, examining scientific studies on this topic would be a more rational option. The purpose of this review is to acquire information from literature studies on the risk of TBIs causing dementia, possible mechanisms, and triggering factors.

Introduction

The main causes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) include traffic accidents, falls, assaults, and sports-related injuries.[1] However, a recent study indicates that falls, particularly affecting the elderly, are the most common cause of TBI.[2]

The duration of symptoms following TBI is inversely related to socioeconomic status and directly proportional to psychiatric disorders and substance abuse.[3]

Traumatic brain injuries are classified as mild, moderate, and severe based on their severity, with the Glasgow Coma Scale used as a measure in this classification.[4,5] In this scale, patients’ eye opening, motor skills, and verbal skills are tested and classified as severe (3-8), moderate (9-12), and mild (13-15).[6]

Brain injuries are divided into primary brain injury and secondary brain injury based on the timing of the injury. Primary brain injury can be defined as the damage caused by the impact that occurs at the moment the brain is injured, affecting the white matter tracts inside the brain. Additionally, in more severe cases of primary brain injury, there may be disruption of bone integrity by the striking or struck object, leading to penetration. Secondary brain injury, on the other hand, generally occurs following the primary injury, involving long-term damage to brain cells that can result in prolonged problems.[7,8]

NEUROINFLAMMATION AND CYTOKINES IN TBI

In TBI, secondary damage is a spontaneously progressing injury process activated by inflammatory mechanisms following the primary injury. Secondary damage, which can last for weeks from the moment of trauma, can lead to the progression of the inflammatory cascade and long-term damage to cognitive processes such as memory.[9] Additionally, secondary damage can harm the blood-brain barrier (BBB).[10]

Within the neuroimmune system, cytokines and chemokines play a role in the communication between glial cells, astrocytes, and neuroglial cells. In inflammatory conditions, the levels of these cytokines can exceed normal levels.[11,12] It is believed that the inflammation following TBI leads to pyroptosis, i.e., inflammatory cell death, and these cell deaths play a role in the disruption of the BBB.[10]

In the event of damage to the neuron membrane after TBI, damage-associated molecular patterns are exposed.[13-15] Subsequently, as part of the immune system response, proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β are activated.[16] In this context, we can say that post-TBI neuroinflammation is the immune response initiated by the brain in response to TBI.

TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND MEMORY

Individuals who have experienced TBI go through a phase called post-traumatic amnesia after emerging from a coma, during which cognitive impairments are experienced.[17]

One of the cognitive impairments that patients commonly experience during this period is memory problems, a prevalent occurrence after TBI.[18-20] A study conducted on one hundred and forty-seven patients revealed that, four years after the accident, 67.5% of the patients most frequently complained of memory problems.[18] Research on its treatment indicates the effectiveness of internal memory methods such as cues and visual imagery, which can enhance performance in neuropsychological tests as well.[21]

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DEMENTIA

Dementia has been a progressively increasing and potentially fatal condition in recent years. Meta-analyses on dementia prevalence indicate that it is 1.5% at the age of sixty-five and doubles every four years, reaching 30% at the age of eighty.[22-24] The risk of dementia is lower in men and individuals of Asian and African descent.[25-27] Similarly, the risk of dementia after TBI has been found to be higher in women and Caucasians.[28,29] According to the World Health Organization’s 2010 census, approximately thirty-five and a half million people worldwide were identified as having dementia, and it is expected that this number will triple by 2050.[30]

Making a decision about the type of dementia can be challenging due to the similar and overlapping symptoms of different types. If we categorize dementia into several types, they include 1. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 2. Lewy body dementia, 3. Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), 4. Vascular dementia, 5. Mixed dementia.[31]

Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by loss of neurons and synapses in the central nervous system, leading to cognitive decline (especially in memory), self-care deficiencies, and behavioral disturbances.[32-34] Pathologies such as senile amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), and excessive neuronal loss develop in the brain.[35] While these pathologies can also be observed independently in normal aging, they are more specific and severe in certain regions in AD. Neurofibrillary tangles formation occurs in the neocortex, whereas senile plaques form in limbic system components such as the amygdala and hippocampus.[36-38]

Tau proteins play a crucial role in the formation of NFTs by binding to microtubules, which are essential for axonal transmission. In AD, the binding of tau protein to microtubules is hindered due to hyperphosphorylation, disrupting axonal transport. The unbound tau proteins remain within the cell, combining with filaments involved in the cell’s cytoskeleton to polymerize and form NFTs.[39] Consequently, both axonal transmission and cell cytoskeletal structure are compromised. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that tau protein alone can lead to FTD.[40]

Risk factors and symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease

In addition to all of these, aging, especially beyond the age of sixty-five, is a significant risk factor, with the frequency of occurrence found to increase fivefold every year after sixty-five.[41-43] Another risk factor is genetic predisposition, with genetic studies confirming an increased risk of AD among relatives.[40,42,44] Some other risk factors include cerebrovascular diseases, obesity, smoking, frequency of physical activity, depression, and dyslipidemia.[45, 46]

Alzheimer’s disease begins with the most noticeable symptom of memory impairment in its early stages, and as the disease progresses, cognitive abilities such as attention, executive functions, thinking, behavior, and speech are affected.[32,47,48] Alzheimer’s disease is classified into seven stages based on clinical symptoms:

Stage 1: The patient starts to exhibit minor cognitive impairment symptoms, and this is a period when changes occur in the central nervous system.

Stage 2 (very mild cognitive impairment): The patient begins to forget the locations of items such as keys, wallet, and glasses, but other cognitive functions like speech are not yet affected.

Stage 3 (mild cognitive impairment): Patients struggle to recall words during conversations and frequently lose their belongings. Planning and organizational skills start to decline.

Stage 4 (moderate cognitive impairment): Significant losses in short-term memory are observed, and patients may struggle to remember things they have done. Some social withdrawal may occur. This condition may arise from the concern that memory problems may create communication issues.

Stage 5 (moderately severe cognitive impairment/ early stage dementia): Patients experience confusion about time and place. They may have difficulty remembering the names of schools they graduated from and struggle with object recognition (agnosia). Learning new motor skills or performing previously known ones can be challenging (apraxia). Patients in this stage become unable to carry out routine activities such as bathing, dressing, using the toilet, and eating.

Stage 6 (severe cognitive impairment/mid-stage dementia): Difficulty in spontaneous speech, word finding, and communication skills declines. Some patients may experience urinary and fecal incontinence.

Stage 7 (very severe cognitive impairment/late-stage dementia): Patients’ speech abilities are reduced, and they may experience difficulty swallowing. They require 24-hour care.[48]

Lewy Body Dementia

Lewy body dementia is the second most common type of dementia, occurring after AD.[49-52] Its key clinical features include cognitive fluctuations occurring alongside dementia, recurrent visual hallucinations, and parkinsonism.[50,53]

Frontotemporal Dementia

Frontotemporal dementia is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by behavioral problems, executive dysfunction, and language impairments that vary depending on the stage of the disease.[54]

It is hypothesized that changes in neurotransmitters (glutamate, noradrenaline, serotonin, dopamine, and acetylcholine) play a significant role in the neuro-pathological basis and behavioral alterations in FTD.[55] Studies on the role of serotonin in FTD have observed a decrease in serotonin receptors in the temporal and frontal cortex through brain imaging and autopsy studies.[56] Additionally, a decrease in serotonin release has been identified in the raphe nucleus neurons, which control serotonin release.[57] Research on dopamine indicates that FTD patients have lower levels of the dopamine metabolite homovanillic acid in cerebrospinal fluid compared to normal individuals.[58] Furthermore, a reduction in presynaptic dopamine transporters has been detected in the putamen and caudate nucleus.[59] Studies on the glutamate neurotransmitter show a decrease in glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartic acid and alphaamino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors in cortical pyramidal cells[60] and the frontal-temporal cortex.[61]

Mixed Dementia

Mixed dementia refers to the coexistence of AD and vascular dementia, although it has not been extensively studied.[62] Due to the limited comprehensive research on MD, risk factors are not well known. However, a few studies have found that it includes risk factors for both AD and vascular dementia.[62-65]

Vascular Dementia

Vascular dementia is a potentially preventable form of dementia that can develop as a secondary condition due to another disease or issue. It is the second most common type of dementia after AD.[66] Examining risk factors, research on cognitive impairment following a stroke has found that vascular dementia is the most common outcome.[67] In other words, stroke is a significant risk factor for vascular dementia.

THE LINK BETWEEN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND DEMENTIA

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neuropathological condition that develops after head injuries. Similarities have been observed between the pathological changes observed in the brains of individuals with TBI and CTE and the pathologies associated with AD.[68]

Another piece of evidence suggesting the potential development of neurodegenerative disorders like dementia after TBI comes from studies indicating degeneration of white matter pathways (e.g., corpus callosum) and brain structures several years following moderate to severe TBI.[69-71]

Frontal and temporal brain regions, in particular, are more sensitive to trauma compared to other brain regions, and this sensitivity may be associated with the presence of FTD.[72] In a study on TBI and dementia risk, it was found that the risk of dementia increased by 1.44 times in the 25 years following TBI.[73]

The formation of amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques is well-known in AD.[74,75] After TBI, the disruption of the BBB we mentioned may lead to the accumulation of Aβ, similar to AD, suggesting an association between AD and TBI.[76,77] It is believed that the accumulation of Aβ plaques, reaching the oligomeric form, disrupts neuronal homeostasis and increases the risk of apoptotic neuronal death.[78-80]

Following TBI, the accumulation of these Aβ plaques in the perivascular space of the brain is possible. A decrease in pH in brain plasma, i.e., metabolic acidosis, can enhance Aβ plaque accumulation.[81] Another risk factor for Aβ accumulation is ischemic damage.[80]

After TBI, blood flow in certain tissues of the brain decreases due to the impact. Subsequently, the imbalance of free radicals in tissues entering the reperfusion stage during the secondary injury process leads to oxidative stress.[82] These radicals can also be a risk factor for apoptotic neuronal death.[83-85]

The resulting oxidative stress activates the kinase protein activated by stress, leading to the stimulation of β-secretase and γ-secretase enzymes that produce the precursor of Aβ, amyloid precursor protein. In this scenario, there will be an increase in Aβ in the brain and, indirectly, neuronal deaths.

Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter with a widespread distribution in the brain, playing a role in long-term memory and attention processes.[86-89] Acetylcholine has both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, which play a role in memory and attention processes. A decrease in both receptor types has been found in AD patients. Additionally, a reduction in the enzyme choline acetyltransferase, which is involved in the synthesis of acetylcholine, has been observed in AD.[90]

In conclusion, TBI can lead to various problems such as attention disorders, memory impairment, depression, and cognitive decline. Dementia, which is a complex disorder that often develops as a result of the disruption of many brain activities, manifests itself through problems such as memory loss and is categorized into different types. The commonality among these types is memory issues. Typically, the brain tends to avoid remembering such traumas, and sometimes it may even erase parts of experiences as a known response. However, the memory impairments in dementia go beyond this. Neurophysiological anomalies, such as acute pathologies developing after brain injury, the immune system responding with inflammation, resulting in neuronal loss, imbalance in cell equilibrium, and disruption of neuronal transmission, are observed. As a result, the impact of damage does not diminish immediately after trauma; instead, it gradually develops and eventually leads to a state where an individual cannot perform personal tasks. The prolonged effect of damage through primary and secondary injury processes contributes to the development of dementia. The close relationship between TBI and dementia is still under investigation. According to current research, TBI is a potential risk factor for the development of dementia, affecting various neurotransmitter levels in the brain, and can lead to dementia in the short and long term through different mechanisms. This risk, exacerbated by the increased sensitivity of older individuals, can affect them more significantly. However, falls, sports injuries, and similar causes can also lead to TBI in adults and children. Although individuals aged sixty and above may experience similar cognitive problems and neuronal deaths, the affected brain regions may not lead to dementia at the same severity level. Dementia is a widespread public health concern, and further research is needed for a better understanding of its mechanisms, implementation of preventive measures, and the development of effective treatments.

Cite this article as: Demirci Ö, Erbaş O. Dementia Risk After Traumatic Brain Injury. JEB Med Sci 2023;4(3):180-186.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

References

  1. Azouvi P, Arnould A, Dromer E, Vallat-Azouvi C. Neuropsychology of traumatic brain injury: An expert overview. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2017 Jul-Aug;173:461-72.
  2. Roozenbeek B, Maas AIR, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:231-6.
  3. Nordstro¨m A, Edin BB, Lindstro¨m S, Nordstro¨m P. Cognitive function and other risk factors for mild traumatic brain injury in young men: nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2013;346:f723.
  4. Erbaş O, Yılmaz M. The effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics on the electrical activity of the brain in a rat model. J Clin Exp Invest. 2013;4:279-84.
  5. Sternbach GL. The Glasgow Coma Scale1. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 2000;19:67-71.
  6. Corrigan JD, Selassie AW, Orman JA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010;25:72-80.
  7. Siesjo BK. Basic mechanisms of traumatic brain damage. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:959-69.
  8. Üzümcü İ, Erbaş O. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Polymorphism and Depression-Suicide. JEB Med Sci 2021;2:170-80.
  9. Gruol DL. Impact of Increased Astrocyte Expression of IL-6, CCL2 or CXCL10 in Transgenic Mice on Hippocampal Synaptic Function. Brain Sci. 2016 Jun 17;6:19.
  10. Brickler T, Gresham K, Meza A, Coutermarsh-Ott S, Williams TM, Rothschild DE, et al. Nonessential Role for the NLRP1 Inflammasome Complex in a Murine Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:6373506.
  11. Nizamutdinov D, Shapiro LA. Overview of Traumatic Brain Injury: An Immunological Context. Brain Sci. 2017 Jan 23;7:11.
  12. Erbaş O, Akseki HS, Aktuğ H, Taşkıran D. Low-grade chronic inflammation induces behavioral stereotypy in rats. Metab Brain Dis. 2015 Jun;30:739-46.
  13. Corps KN, Roth TL, McGavern DB. Inflammation and neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 2015 Mar;72:355-62.
  14. Sheikh AM, Nagai A, Ryu JK, McLarnon JG, Kim SU, Masuda J. Lysophosphatidylcholine induces glial cell activation: role of rho kinase. Glia. 2009 Jun;57:898-907.
  15. Uchida K. Redox-derived damage-associated molecular patterns: Ligand function of lipid peroxidation adducts. Redox Biol. 2013 Feb 12;1:94-6.
  16. Ransohoff RM, Brown MA. Innate immunity in the central nervous system. J Clin Invest. 2012 Apr;122:1164-71.
  17. Russel WR, Smith A. Post-traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Arch Neurol. 1961 Jul;5:4-17.
  18. Jourdan C, Bayen E, Pradat-Diehl P, Ghout I, Darnoux E, Azerad S, et al. A comprehensive picture of 4-year outcome of severe brain injuries. Results from the ParisTBI study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2016;59:100-6.
  19. Van Zomeren AH, Van den Burg W. Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:21-8.
  20. Brooks DN, McKinlay WW. Personality and behavioural change after severe blunt head injury: a relative’s view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:336-44.
  21. Velikonja D, Tate R, Ponsford J, McIntyre A, Janzen S, Bayley M; INCOG Expert Panel. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part V: memory. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;29:369-86.
  22. Hofman A, Rocca WA, Brayne C, Breteler MM, Clarke M, Cooper B, et al. The prevalence of dementia in Europe: a collaborative study of 1980-1990 findings. Eurodem Prevalence Research Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Sep;20:736-48.
  23. Jorm AF, Korten AE, Henderson AS. The prevalence of dementia: a quantitative integration of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987 Nov;76:465-79.
  24. Ritchie K, Kildea D. Is senile dementia "age-related" or "ageing-related"?--evidence from meta-analysis of dementia prevalence in the oldest old. Lancet. 1995 Oct 7;346:931-4.
  25. Karahan G, Kaya H, Erdogan MA, Yigitturk G, Gokyayla E, Erbas O. Effects of trimetazidine on nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve injury model. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120:777-82.
  26. Chandra V, Ganguli M, Pandav R, Johnston J, Belle S, DeKosky ST. Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in rural India: the Indo-US study. Neurology. 1998 Oct;51:1000-8.
  27. Zhang MY, Katzman R, Salmon D, Jin H, Cai GJ, Wang ZY, et al. The prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease in Shanghai, China: impact of age, gender, and education. Ann Neurol. 1990 Apr;27:428-37.
  28. Rahman A, Jackson H, Hristov H, Isaacson RS, Saif N, Shetty T, et al. Sex and Gender Driven Modifiers of Alzheimer's: The Role for Estrogenic Control Across Age, Race, Medical, and Lifestyle Risks. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Nov 15;11:315.
  29. Weuve J, Barnes LL, Mendes de Leon CF, Rajan KB, Beck T, Aggarwal NT, et al. Cognitive Aging in Black and White Americans: Cognition, Cognitive Decline, and Incidence of Alzheimer Disease Dementia. Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29:151-9.
  30. Wortmann M. Dementia: a global health priority- highlights from an ADI and World Health Organization report. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2012 Sep 21;4:40.
  31. Nelson PT, Head E, Schmitt FA, Davis PR, Neltner JH, Jicha GA, et al. Alzheimer's disease is not "brain aging": neuropathological, genetic, and epidemiological human studies. Acta Neuropathol. 2011 May;121:571-87.
  32. Gilman S. Alzheimer's disease. Perspect Biol Med. 1997 Winter;40:230-45.
  33. Lleó A, Greenberg SM, Growdon JH. Current pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer's disease. Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:513-33.
  34. Erbaş O, Solmaz V, Aksoy D. Inhibitor effect of dexketoprofen in rat model of pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures. Neurol Res. 2015;37:1096-101.
  35. Katzman R, Saitoh T. Advances in Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J. 1991 Mar 1;5:278-86.
  36. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82:239-59.
  37. Khachaturian ZS. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol. 1985 Nov;42:1097-105.
  38. Probst A, Langui D, Ipsen S, Robakis N, Ulrich J. Deposition of beta/A4 protein along neuronal plasma membranes in diffuse senile plaques. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;83:21-9.
  39. Pîrşcoveanu DFV, Pirici I, Tudorică V, Bălşeanu TA, Albu VC, Bondari S, et al. Tau protein in neurodegenerative diseases-a review. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017;58:1141-50.
  40. Poorkaj P, Bird TD, Wijsman E, Nemens E, Garruto RM, Anderson L, et al. Tau is a candidate gene for chromosome 17 frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol. 1998 Jun;43:815-25.
  41. Gao S, Hendrie HC, Hall KS, Hui S. The relationships between age, sex, and the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;55:809-15.
  42. Wang XP, Ding HL. Alzheimer's disease: epidemiology, genetics, and beyond. Neurosci Bull. 2008 Apr;24:105-9.
  43. Hattori H. [Elderly depression and depressive state with Alzheimer's disease]. Nihon Rinsho. 2009 Apr;67:835-44.
  44. Williamson J, Goldman J, Marder KS. Genetic aspects of Alzheimer disease. Neurologist. 2009 Mar;15:80-6.
  45. Silva MVF, Loures CMG, Alves LCV, de Souza LC, Borges KBG, Carvalho MDG. Alzheimer's disease: risk factors and potentially protective measures. J Biomed Sci. 2019 May 9;26:33.
  46. Erdogan MA, Kirazlar M, Yigitturk G, Erbas O. Digoxin Exhibits Neuroprotective Properties in a Rat Model of Dementia. Neurochem Res. 2022 May;47:1290-98.
  47. Samanta MK, Wilson B, Santhi K, Kumar KP, Suresh B. Alzheimer disease and its management: a review. Am J Ther. 2006 Nov-Dec;13:516-26.
  48. Friedlander AH, Norman DC, Mahler ME, Norman KM, Yagiela JA. Alzheimer's disease: psychopathology, medical management and dental implications. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137:1240-51.
  49. Li X, Rastogi P, Gibbons JA, Chaudhury S. Visuo-cognitive skill deficits in Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body disease: A comparative analysis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2014 Jan;17:12-8.
  50. Ghika J. Maladie a corps de Lewy [Diffuse Lewy body disease]. Rev Med Suisse Romande. 2000 Nov;120:843-6. French.
  51. Artunc-Ulkumen B, Pala HG, Pala EE, Yavasoglu A, Yigitturk G, Erbas O. Exenatide improves ovarian and endometrial injury and preserves ovarian reserve in streptozocin induced diabetic rats. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Mar;31:196-201.
  52. Zweig YR, Galvin JE. Lewy body dementia: the impact on patients and caregivers. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Apr 25;6:21.
  53. Fujishiro H, Iseki E, Nakamura S, Kasanuki K, Chiba Y, Ota K, et al. Dementia with Lewy bodies: early diagnostic challenges. Psychogeriatrics. 2013 Jun;13:128-38.
  54. Bang J, Spina S, Miller BL. Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet. 2015 Oct 24;386:1672-82.
  55. Huey ED, Putnam KT, Grafman J. A systematic review of neurotransmitter deficits and treatments in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2006 Jan 10;66:17-22.
  56. Procter AW, Qurne M, Francis PT. Neurochemical features of frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;10 Suppl 1:80-4.
  57. Yang Y, Schmitt HP. Frontotemporal dementia: evidence for impairment of ascending serotoninergic but not noradrenergic innervation. Immunocytochemical and quantitative study using a graph method. Acta Neuropathol. 2001 Mar;101:256-70.
  58. Sjögren M, Minthon L, Passant U, Blennow K, Wallin A. Decreased monoamine metabolites in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1998 Sep-Oct;19:379-84.
  59. Rinne JO, Laine M, Kaasinen V, Norvasuo-Heilä MK, Någren K, Helenius H. Striatal dopamine transporter and extrapyramidal symptoms in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2002 May 28;58:1489-93.
  60. Ferrer I. Neurons and their dendrites in frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;10 Suppl 1:55-60.
  61. Engelborghs S, Vloeberghs E, Le Bastard N, Van Buggenhout M, Mariën P, Somers N, et al. The dopaminergic neurotransmitter system is associated with aggression and agitation in frontotemporal dementia. Neurochem Int. 2008 May;52:1052-60.
  62. Van Duijn CM, Stijnen T, Hofman A. Risk factors for Alzheimer's disease: overview of the EURODEM collaborative re-analysis of case-control studies. EURODEM Risk Factors Research Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20 Suppl 2:S4-12.
  63. Breteler MM. Vascular risk factors for Alzheimer's disease: an epidemiologic perspective. Neurobiol Aging. 2000 Mar-Apr;21:153-60.
  64. Skoog I. Risk factors for vascular dementia: a review. Dementia. 1994 May-Aug;5:137-44.
  65. Gorelick PB. Status of risk factors for dementia associated with stroke. Stroke. 1997 Feb;28:459-63.
  66. Hachinski V. Preventable senility: a call for action against the vascular dementias. Lancet. 1992 Sep 12;340:645-8.
  67. Chui H. Dementia due to subcortical ischemic vascular disease. Clin Cornerstone. 2001;3:40-51.
  68. McKee AC, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, Stein TD, Alvarez VE, Daneshvar DH, et al. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain. 2013 Jan;136:43-64.
  69. Tomaiuolo F, Bivona U, Lerch JP, Di Paola M, Carlesimo GA, Ciurli P, et al. Memory and anatomical change in severe non missile traumatic brain injury: ~1 vs. ~8 years follow-up. Brain Res Bull. 2012 Mar 10;87:373-82.
  70. Dinkel J, Drier A, Khalilzadeh O, Perlbarg V, Czernecki V, Gupta R, et al; for NICER (Neuro Imaging for Coma Emergence and Recovery) Consortium. Long-term white matter changes after severe traumatic brain injury: a 5-year prospective cohort. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan;35:23-9.
  71. Farbota KD, Bendlin BB, Alexander AL, Rowley HA, Dempsey RJ, Johnson SC. Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging and neuropsychological correlates in traumatic brain injury patients. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 19;6:160.
  72. Bigler ED. Anterior and middle cranial fossa in traumatic brain injury: relevant neuroanatomy and neuropathology in the study of neuropsychological outcome. Neuropsychology. 2007 Sep;21:515-31.
  73. Schneider ALC, Selvin E, Latour L, Turtzo LC, Coresh J, Mosley T, et al. Head injury and 25-year risk of dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Sep;17:1432-41.
  74. Perry DC, Sturm VE, Peterson MJ, Pieper CF, Bullock T, Boeve BF, et al. Association of traumatic brain injury with subsequent neurological and psychiatric disease: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;124:511-26.
  75. Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2013 Aug;246:35-43.
  76. Gürkan G, Atasoy Ö, Çini N, Sever İH, Özkul B, Yaprak G, et al. Reparative, Neuroprotective and Anti-neurodegenerative Effects of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor in Radiation-Induced Brain Injury Model. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2023 Sep;66:511-24.
  77. Pluta R, Furmaga-Jabłońska W, Maciejewski R, Ułamek-Kozioł M, Jabłoński M. Brain ischemia activates β- and γ-secretase cleavage of amyloid precursor protein: significance in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2013 Feb;47:425-34.
  78. ‘Old Protein, New Medicine - Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor [Working Title]’, Biochemistry. IntechOpen, 2024. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.111201.
  79. Fossati S, Ghiso J, Rostagno A. Insights into caspase-mediated apoptotic pathways induced by amyloid-β in cerebral microvascular endothelial cells. Neurodegener Dis. 2012;10:324-8.
  80. Salminen A, Kauppinen A, Kaarniranta K. Hypoxia/ ischemia activate processing of Amyloid Precursor Protein: impact of vascular dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurochem. 2017 Feb;140:536-49.
  81. Acharya S, Srivastava KR, Nagarajan S, Lapidus LJ. Monomer Dynamics of Alzheimer Peptides and Kinetic Control of Early Aggregation in Alzheimer's Disease. Chemphyschem. 2016 Nov 4;17:3470-9.
  82. Chan PH. Reactive oxygen radicals in signaling and damage in the ischemic brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001 Jan;21:2-14.
  83. Sugawara T, Fujimura M, Noshita N, Kim GW, Saito A, Hayashi T, et al. Neuronal death/survival signaling pathways in cerebral ischemia. NeuroRx. 2004 Jan;1:17-25.
  84. Mehta SL, Manhas N, Raghubir R. Molecular targets in cerebral ischemia for developing novel therapeutics. Brain Res Rev. 2007 Apr;54:34-66.
  85. Nakka VP, Gusain A, Mehta SL, Raghubir R. Molecular mechanisms of apoptosis in cerebral ischemia: multiple neuroprotective opportunities. Mol Neurobiol. 2008 Feb;37:7-38.
  86. Woolf NJ. A structural basis for memory storage in mammals. Prog Neurobiol. 1998 May;55:59-77.
  87. Wenk GL. The nucleus basalis magnocellularis cholinergic system: one hundred years of progress. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1997 Mar;67:85-95.
  88. Cevik B, Solmaz V, Yigitturk G, Cavusoğlu T, Peker G, Erbas O. Neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin on Alzheimer's dementia model in rats. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;26:23-9.
  89. Sarter M, Bruno JP. Cognitive functions of cortical acetylcholine: toward a unifying hypothesis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997 Feb;23:28-46.
  90. Lombardo S, Maskos U. Role of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in Alzheimer's disease pathology and treatment. Neuropharmacology. 2015 Sep;96:255-62.